Liberal Court Appears Skeptical of Trump's Immunity Claims in Hearing
- Bias Rating
62% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
76% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-57% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-20% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : The case is United States v. Trump, No. 23-3228, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.45% : Polls project Biden will face Trump in November.
38% : WASHINGTON, DC -- Donald Trump appeared in a federal courthouse on Tuesday for oral arguments regarding his potential presidential immunity from prosecution by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
29% : In spirited arguments lasting more than an hour, the three-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit pressed Trump's counsel, John Sauer, on his claims that Trump is immune from prosecution because his actions fell within his official duties as president.
29% : In December, an amicus brief filed by attorneys for former Attorney General Ed Meese argued that Smith's appointment as special counsel by U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland is unconstitutional, so the court must reject his prosecution against Trump.
27% : Prosecutor Jack Pearce, with Smith and Trump looking on, argued that Trump's presidential immunity claims would place him above the law:The president has a unique constitutional role, but he is not above the law.
26% : In that scenario, Trump would not be able to raise the question of immunity until after a jury trial and potential conviction.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.