Military Comparison: A War Between Iran and Britain Would Be Long and
- Bias Rating
12% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
98% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-53% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
57% : Indeed, GlobalFirepower.com lists Iran as being stronger than Britain in several categories:51% : So is Britain or Iran stronger?
48% : Ditto in the air, where Iran's museum mix of a handful of old American-made F-14 and F-4 fighters, Russian-made aircraft that fled from Iraq to Iran and were interned, and Iranian designs such as the Saeqeh, which looks remarkably like the F-5 fighters the U.S. sold to Iran in the 1970s.
47% : "A comparison of the UK and Iran's military strength shows Britain falling behind when it comes to manpower, land and naval strength and petroleum resources," the newspaper proclaimed after Iran seized a British tanker in the Persian Gulf, in retaliation for Britain seizing an Iranian tanker at Gibraltar.
46% : Britain ranks eighth on the "Global Firepower Index," while Iran comes in not far behind in 14th place
44% : Iran has more oil, but weaker finances.
43% : Even with access to bases belonging to Iran's hostile Arab neighbors, the British would still be operating in Iran's home waters, where all the tools of coastal guerrilla warfare - mines, small boat attacks - would be available to Tehran.
40% : First and foremost, while Iran may or may not be developing nuclear weapons, Britain most certainly has them.
39% : Which leaves the more immediate prospect of a limited conflict in the Persian Gulf, most likely a reprise of the 1980s "Tanker War," in which Iran will attack or seize oil tankers in retaliation for economic sanctions, while Britain (and the U.S., and possibly Europe) will attempt to stop them.
39% : In which case, how many tanks Iran and Britain have doesn't matter.
38% : If Iran were to invade Britain, there would be no question of which party is stronger.
37% : Britain and Iran are not in the same league at all.
34% : But that's not the point: Britain isn't sending an armored division to invade Iran.
32% : However, Britain wouldn't use nukes against Iran for political reasons, and Iran would be committing suicide to use them against Britain or anyone else.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.