Never mind UNRWA -- end US funding for the pro-terror United Nations...
- Bias Rating
16% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
45% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
14% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
18% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-27% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
57% : Groups like UN Watch (and The Post) have long sounded the alarm about UNRWA.53% : It's time -- beyond time -- to rethink US funding for the United Nations.
40% : After all, America has laws against financing terrorist groups, and the United Nations does just that:
34% : But President Biden routinely bows to UN-think: White House National Security spokesman John Kirby on Monday echoed Guterres on UNRWA: "Let's not impugn the good work of a whole agency because of the potential bad actions here by a small number.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.