20 Reasons Why Legacy Media Became so Deceptive

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

51% : Election News SuppressionDue to banning, de-amplification, and cover-ups, very few people know that Trump won on "election day 2020" by over 1 million votes in the battleground states.
37% : Election Interference and Election FraudReports of election interference were systematically downplayed or ignored by the media in 2020, but when Trump won, the media 100% believed that there was some type of interference.
36% : Outcome: Trump never promoted ivermectin specifically, and while it is a drug used in both humans and animals, the portrayal of this medicine solely as an animal medication is pure fraud and stupidity of the highest order.16. 'Cages' for Migrant ChildrenWhat Happened: Photos of migrant children in "cages" were widely circulated by the media, with claims that the Trump administration was responsible.
34% : While Trump does not care to protect the democrat's Civil War Monuments, the nation's democrats have still not apologized for slavery, Jim Crow or segregation.11.
31% : Ivermectin - The Media FraudWhat Happened: Some media outlets baselessly claimed that Trump promoted using "horse dewormer" (ivermectin) to treat COVID-19.
27% : Other confused misfits baselessly claimed that Trump and the victims were not hit by bullets even though people died and others were critically injured.
24% : Trump Assassination Plot, Video and Facts SuppressedMajor news outlets downplayed and ignored a clear assassination attempt against Trump, despite clear public video evidence.
22% : The media continually finances what many would call "tainted samples" or fake polls while Trump is still polling 6 points higher than 2016 or 2020 right now according to Rasmussen.6.
17% : Scam Polling Against TrumpIn October 2016, the Washington Post and New York Times confidently claimed that Trump had no chance of winning the presidency.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.