2024 in review: A look back at the Chicago school funding fight in op-eds
- Bias Rating
16% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
14% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-21% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-15% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
59% : Sept. 30: Stacy Davis Gates, "Chicago's public schools have never been fully funded"Our schools have always been underfunded, because they, like our highways and former public housing, are intertwined with the project of segregation in the city.59% : Foundations funded experimental new entries, such as the Noble Network of Charter Schools, which became the system's top performer with a high percentage of minority and low-income children.
51% : It created the opportunity for people like Juan Rangel, who led a charter school network, to replace beloved community schools with enterprises run outside the accountability of local school councils and government oversight.
42% : Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has made increasing funding for public education his cornerstone issue.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.