An Irish society, an unpaid loan and the hypocrisy of Letitia James

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

44% : And yet, in her signature case of People v. Trump, she took the opposite position, holding that "where an organization inflates the value of a property to obtain a loan, that is fraud, even where the lender was aware of the actual value and was paid in full," Doyle's lawsuit says.
36% : An even more important difference is that Trump paid back every penny he owed, but the Society never paid back Doyle.
24% : " Parlatore points out that the Society inflated the value of its property to obtain a loan, just like Trump was accused of doing, but the difference was that Doyle could not conduct the sort of "sophisticated due diligence" that Deutsche Bank did.
22% : Trump was punished with a $355 million fine.
16% : And he points out the uncanny similarities between his client's predicament and the notorious case James brought against Donald Trump for supposedly inflating the value of his properties to get a better mortgage, "although her office is now taking a polar opposite position.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.