Anti-Trump lawfare has resulted in a 'talking point ... while it lasts' * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

58% : While indicating that he is inclined to a sentence without jail or probation, he will finalize the conviction of Trump just 10 days before his inauguration.
53% : That prediction became more likely after Trump was reelected in November.
46% : So, after the Justice Department declined to prosecute federal violations, Bragg effectively did so in state court with Merchan's blessing.
44% : " Turley explained the failings of the lawfare in the case that should be addressed at by higher courts: "Those appellate issues include charges based on a novel criminal theory through which New York County District Attorney Alvin Bragg not only zapped a dead misdemeanor into life (after the expiration of the statute of limitation) but based a state charge on federal election law and federal taxation violations.
39% : It is Juan Merchan, a judge in New York City, who facilitated Bragg's campaign against Trump.
34% : Turley pointed out Trump detractors have "longed for" an "orange-jump-suit moment." "They will likely be disappointed.
32% : Neither Trump nor the public will ever know.
30% : The novel theory demanded a secondary offense, the crime that Trump was seeking to conceal by listing payments as legal expenses.
28% : He said one option was to "suspend" action on the case while Trump serves his second term as president, a scheme in which "Merchan would hold a leash on the president as a criminal defendant awaiting punishment."
25% : He's delayed sentencing for months, a fact that has meant that Trump has not been allowed to appeal, so far.
24% : Multiple other lawfare cases against Trump already have been dismissed.
15% : Now Merchan has said he will announce a punishment for Trump this week.
10% : " He explained the lawfare failure was clear, and even Joe Biden was disappointed that, "Attorney General Merrick Garland as insufficiently aggressive in pursuing Trump.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.