'Arbitrary, Outlandish, and Unjustified': Raskin Warns Trump Against Invoking Insurrection Act | Common Dreams

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

58% : " In his Friday statement, Raskin concluded with a message for Trump: "I urge the president to make the report public and to commit himself to protecting the civil rights and civil liberties of the people of the United States by keeping the military out of civilian law enforcement matters.
56% : " "Trump might want to call out the troops because they look 'tough,'" he acknowledged.
50% : Raskin explained that "the Insurrection Act was designed for only the most extraordinary and dire circumstances, specifically when unlawful rebellion 'make[s] it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any state by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.'
48% : Although "we have no specific information indicating that this will happen," noted Raskin (D-Md.) -- the House Judiciary Committee's ranking member and a constitutional scholar -- the public "anxiety arises from the fact that April 20 is the due date for a report from Trump's Cabinet on the state of the southern border called for in a presidential executive order which specifically mentions the Insurrection Act.
44% : It cannot be the case that this is 'the most secure border in history' and simultaneously that we need to invoke the Insurrection Act to address the crisis there.
42% : Bill Blum wrote about it at Truthdig, PolitiFactdetailed the difference between invoking the Insurrection Act and martial law, and both the ACLU and the Interfaith Alliance shared blog posts.
36% : " Since returning to power, having campaigned on the promise of mass deportations, Trump has sparked fears about crackdowns on civil society, sent immigration agents after foreign students critical of U.S. support for Israel's genocidal assault on the Gaza Strip, and shipped hundreds of migrant men to El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) -- including Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was supposed to be protected by a court order blocking deportation to his homeland.
35% : "There is no factual predicate for Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act at the southern border or anywhere else in the United States," said the congressman and constitutional scholar.
33% : That all followed a Waging Nonviolence piece from earlier this month laying out what to do if Trump takes the feared action.
30% : After being "flooded with messages," the U.S. Rep. Jamie Raskin issued a lengthy Friday statement about mounting rumors that Republican President Donald Trump "may invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 and deploy the National Guard to conduct arrests at the border or elsewhere on U.S. soil" as soon as this weekend.
27% : " According to the congressman: "There is no factual predicate for Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act at the southern border or anywhere else in the United States.
25% : This is plainly no justification for triggering the act, and Trump would also essentially be admitting extreme policy failure.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.