Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started

As SCOTUS hears case on preventive health care, U-M expert can comment

Apr 21, 2025 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    -38% Somewhat Liberal

  • Reliability

    45% ReliableAverage

  • Policy Leaning

    -46% Medium Liberal

  • Politician Portrayal

    10% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

24% Positive

  •   Liberal
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

66% : Fendrick is a professor at the U-M Medical School and School of Public Health and member of the U-M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation.
65% : The case addresses a major provision of the Affordable Care Act: The ability of nearly all Americans to receive preventive health care services such as cancer screenings and vaccines recommended for them, at no cost to them, under almost all forms of health insurance.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link