At the Races: Great egg-spectations - Roll Call

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

55% : A third of House members ran unopposed in their primaries last year, while three-quarters of state legislative primaries were uncontested, the Times analysis found.
52% : One is the Trump administration's efforts, through the office known as the Department of Government Efficiency, to reduce the size of the federal workforce.
47% : Former Del. Dave LaRock has filed paperwork and is collecting signatures for a gubernatorial run, the Virginia Scope reports, while former state Sen. Amanda Chase, who has billed herself as "Trump in heels," is also collecting signatures to earn a place on the ballot.
46% : National Journal looks at whether Trump may spread the wealth with other Republicans on the ballot in next year's elections -- something he hasn't prioritized in past midterms.
43% : Even though Trump has endorsed the idea, the measure faces long odds.
34% : Cash is king: Trump may not be eligible for another White House run under the Constitution, but his campaign is still fundraising.
32% : Meanwhile, the Democrat-controlled Maine House voted to censure Republican state Rep. Laurel Libby, who posted photos and identifying information about a transgender student-athlete days before Trump threatened to withhold federal funding from the state for not complying with his recent executive order.
22% : Or, as our Editor-in-Chief Jason Dick writes this week, "No really; it's still the economy, stupid." What's old is new again: Democrats are criticizing the budget resolution adopted by House Republicans this week as an attack on Medicaid, reviving their 2018 focus on health care that helped them win the House as they look to another Trump midterm next year.
9% : The Boston Globe explores a political rift in Cumberland, Maine, which is at the center of a dispute between Trump and Gov. Janet Mills over transgender athletes.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.