Hot Air Article Rating

BREAKING: Trump Takes Merchan-Bragg Case to SCOTUS

  • Bias Rating

    78% Very Conservative

  • Reliability

    65% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    92% Very Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -36% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-8% Negative

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

45% : This also looks like a long shot, since the Supreme Court does not usually inject itself in state judicial processes, not unless there are serious constitutional questions involved.
45% : To take that issue to the Supreme Court, Trump would normally have to exhaust his appeals within the New York state judicial system and then ask for a Supreme Court review.
44% : It recognizes the immunity that had been assumed until lately for sitting presidents from civil and criminal litigation over official acts.
43% : "The immunity finding in Trump v US doesn't touch on the status of presidents-elect, though.
43% : The better argument here would be that Merchan ignored Trump v US and allowed the conviction to stand even though Alvin Bragg and his prosecutors relied on official acts as part of their evidentiary chain.
41% : Having had his Article 78 lawsuit tossed out by the appellate court in New York, Trump has now filed an emergency application to the Supreme Court to stop the upcoming sentencing hearing by Judge Juan Merchan:
41% : Presidents-elect can't conduct official acts until they take the oath of office, nor does the ruling in Trump v US even suggest that the immunity somehow reaches all pending litigation during a time when the president is between terms.
38% : To get there, Trump would have to go through his sentencing hearing, which in New York unlocks the appeals process for convicted defendants.
36% : Will the Article III option fare any better for Donald Trump?
33% : Trump's application here may present a potential constitutional issue, but is it pressing enough for federal intervention at this point?The New York Times reports that the application argues -- as did his Article 78 lawsuit -- that the election results make Trump immune from further criminal or civil litigation:The effort hinges on Mr. Trump's argument that he is entitled to full immunity from prosecution, and even sentencing, now that he is the president-elect.
28% : Trump was found guilty of 34 felony counts for falsifying business records earlier this summer and is scheduled to be sentenced Friday at 9:30 a.m.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link