CHRISTOPHER RUFO: Trump vs. Harvard and the whole Ivy League. Why the right is winning the higher ed battle
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
35% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-38% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
15% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : In a series of letters to Ivy League presidents, it has threatened to withhold billions in federal funding, citing violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other non-discrimination policies.61% : The first field of battle is higher education.
51% : Consider the historical precedent: if pressed, I'm sure Eisgruber would concede that President Eisenhower was right to mandate desegregation in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1957 -- and to deploy the 101st Airborne Division to enforce it.
47% : In fact, they are among the most active practitioners of racial discrimination, stereotyping, and segregation in America today.
47% : In fact, they are among the most active practitioners of racial discrimination, stereotyping, and segregation in America today.
38% : Eisgruber argues that federal intervention is illegitimate, but he has no ground to stand on.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.