Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started
ABC News Article Rating

Civil rights groups sue Trump over executive order requiring citizenship proof in registering to vote

Apr 02, 2025 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    -6% Center

  • Reliability

    85% ReliableGood

  • Policy Leaning

    10% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    10% Positive

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-5% Negative

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

61% : Ahead of Trump's inauguration, on Jan. 3, Texas Republican Rep. Chip Roy introduced H.R. 22 -- legislation known as the "Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act" or the SAVE Act -- a bill that would require people to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections.
54% : As the U.S. House considers the SAVE Act this week, House Speaker Mike Johnson House and GOP leaders urged bipartisan support for the legislation in a statement on Monday.
53% : The executive order, which Trump signed on March 25, requires stricter voting regulations in federal elections, including showing proof of citizenship when registering to vote.
46% : "Like the SAVE Act, this executive order is part of a broader voter suppression strategy designed to silence eligible voters rather than protect election integrity," Lakin said.
30% : The lawsuit, which is known as "League of Women Voters v. Trump," argues that the president "has no authority to make or change the rules for conducting federal elections," -- a claim that was also made in a similar federal lawsuit challenging this executive order that was filed in D.C. court on Monday by The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) - the largest civil rights organization in the U.S. "In the [Executive Order] the President attempts to usurp the power to regulate federal elections from Congress, the States, and an independent agency to which Congress delegated certain limited responsibilities," plaintiffs argue in the "League of Women Voters v. Trump," claiming that the president is violating the "constitutional separation of powers.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link