Climate change craziness has a new target and it's more shocking than ever

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

52% : As an example, the Left wants to abolish air conditioning, which requires electricity, which mostly comes from fossil fuels.
44% : What possible harm have they suffered from fossil fuels?
43% : The settlement will require the state to eliminate fossil fuels from its transportation system by 2045, and also formally recognizes the right to file future lawsuits against other parties.
42% : There, a group of 13 teenagers -- honest, I'm not making this up -- sued Hawaii's government over its use of fossil fuels.
40% : Meanwhile, there is no evidence backing up the absurd claim by teenagers that if Hawaii stopped using fossil fuels, the state's weather conditions would improve.
39% : After recent flooding in Vermont, green activists sued the state for not abolishing fossil fuels.
39% : Here's what's so frightening about these sham lawsuits from trial lawyers who hope to turn oil companies into cash cows, similar to the tobacco lawsuits 20 years ago: The end game of lawsuits against states and oil and gas companies for using or producing energy because of alleged damage to the environment could bring about abolition of fossil fuels through the back door of the nation's courthouses.
37% : The climate change industrial complex has now joined forces with trial lawyers to advance their war on fossil fuels.
37% : But what none of these judges or litigators take into account is the catastrophic economic effects of NOT using fossil fuels.
35% : UNLEASHES ON BIDEN FOR HALTING KEY NATURAL GAS PROJECTSThe irony is that this island paradise in the Pacific -- whose primary industry is tourism -- is going to collapse without fossil fuels.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.