Washington Post Article Rating

Column | What we learned about Pete Hegseth in nearly five hours of questions

  • Bias Rating

    10% Center

  • Reliability

    50% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    10% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    -26% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

9% Positive

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

31% : Slotkin's query wasn't based on a hypothetical situation but rather precedent, as Trump made use of the military during the racial justice marches of 2021, when officers cleared Lafayette Square of peaceful protesters and flew helicopters low over others.
24% : "He scooted around a pointed question from Elissa Slotkin, the newly elected Democratic senator from Michigan, a state Trump won, when she tried to get a sense of whether Hegseth would be willing to let loose the military on Americans if the incoming commander in chief ordered him to do so.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link