
Dem Rep. Jasmine Crockett suggests US might not 'have elections' in...
- Bias Rating
56% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
40% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
82% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-12% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
8% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
34% : She's also flirted with 2024 election results denialism during a Delivering on Government Efficiency subcommittee meeting last month, where she called Trump, 78, "the person that allegedly got elected.22% : Far-left congresswoman Jasmine Crockett has questioned whether the US will be holding a presidential election in four years, doubling down on her previously stated crackpot narrative that President Trump is a dictator bent on undoing democratic norms.
20% : " Crockett is well known for drawing controversy over wild statements and assertions, including calling Trump a "dictator" and an "enemy to the United States" during an appearance on MSNBC earlier this month.
13% : Speaking on CNN Thursday, AOC called Schumer's vote "a tremendous mistake," and slammed the GOP plan he helped pass as turning the federal government "into a slush fund for Donald Trump and Elon Musk.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.