Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started
New York Post Article Rating

Dem Rep. Jasmine Crockett suggests US might not 'have elections' in...

Mar 16, 2025 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    56% Medium Conservative

  • Reliability

    40% ReliableAverage

  • Policy Leaning

    82% Very Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -12% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

8% Positive

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

34% : She's also flirted with 2024 election results denialism during a Delivering on Government Efficiency subcommittee meeting last month, where she called Trump, 78, "the person that allegedly got elected.
22% : Far-left congresswoman Jasmine Crockett has questioned whether the US will be holding a presidential election in four years, doubling down on her previously stated crackpot narrative that President Trump is a dictator bent on undoing democratic norms.
20% : " Crockett is well known for drawing controversy over wild statements and assertions, including calling Trump a "dictator" and an "enemy to the United States" during an appearance on MSNBC earlier this month.
13% : Speaking on CNN Thursday, AOC called Schumer's vote "a tremendous mistake," and slammed the GOP plan he helped pass as turning the federal government "into a slush fund for Donald Trump and Elon Musk.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link