Don't be fooled, 'Green Energy' is neither green nor energy

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

69% : "Green energy" isn't really energy Calling solar and wind "green energy" makes them seem like other forms of energy, just "green."
66% : Because "green energy" has so much environmental impact, even on today's small scale it faces huge "green" opposition to its land use, mining, and transmission-line-building requirements.
65% : Calling solar and wind "green energy" makes them seem like other forms of energy, just "green."
56% : An International Energy Agency projection for a "net zero" scenario shows an increase in mining and processing of minerals such as lithium, graphite, nickel, and rare earths by 4,200%, 2,500%, 1,900%, and 700% by 2040.
50% : Center for Industrial Progress founder and CEO Alex Epstein discusses the lack of education surrounding green energy production on 'Cavuto: Coast to Coast.'
48% : US POWER GRID FACING ELEVATED RISK OF SHORTAGES THIS SUMMER AMID GREEN ENERGY PUSH: WATCHDOG "Green" solar and wind may someday become a part of real energy solutions -- if generators using solar and wind are willing to guarantee reliability, instead of generating unreliable power and forcing everyone else to clean up their mess.
47% : " "Green energy" isn't really green

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.