
Employers should continue waiving preventive care out-of-pocket costs regardless of how Supreme Court rules
- Bias Rating
-50% Medium Liberal
- Reliability
65% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-50% Medium Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
31% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
66% : Preventive health care coverage has proven to be a worthwhile benefit that saves lives and improves health.61% : Removing cost sharing for preventive services is especially important because 29% of those with employer-sponsored health insurance have high-deductible health plans (HDHPs).
58% : A very broad decision could strike down all preventive service mandates under the Affordable Care Act.
58% : For those with deductibles, the average aggregate deductible for HDHPs was $4,991 in 2024, and the Affordable Care Act allows a family plan deductibles of up to $18,400 in 2025.
55% : These laws do not apply to self-funded plans, which cover almost two-thirds of those with employer-sponsored health insurance.
55% : These rules would not change as the result of Braidwood, so the tax deductibility of health savings accounts should not be adversely impacted by continuing to provide coverage with no out-of-pocket costs for these services.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.