Federal court leaders slam Biden for vetoing bill to add 66 new judges
- Bias Rating
44% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
30% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-38% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
11% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : ALL 13 OF BIDEN'S PRESIDENTIAL VETOES"The president's veto will contribute to the pattern of growing caseloads and increasing backlogs that hurt litigants and weaken public confidence in our courts," Conrad wrote in a statement on Tuesday, adding that Biden's decision is "a deviation from the long historical pattern of approving judgeship bills that awarded new judgeships to sitting Presidents.38% : Despite pleas from within the judicial branch, Biden cited concerns in his veto about the expedited approval process and the allocation of the judgeships, though deeper concerns among Democrats, like how Trump would gain roughly two-dozen more seats to fill in the next four years, complicated their support of the bill after the 2024 election.
29% : Tobias said he's hopeful that lawmakers will be able to pass a similar measure over the next four years under Trump but warned, "I don't think the votes are going to be there.""Unless they want to blow up the Senate 60-vote filibuster over this issue," Tobias said, adding he saw that as unlikely.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.