'Freaking out': Trump mocked for saying 'out loud' why he withdrew Stefanik's nomination
- Bias Rating
-32% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-18% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
18% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
61% : "There are others that can do a good job at the United Nations.61% : "There are others that can do a good job at the United Nations.
50% : NOTUS reporter Reese Gorman tweeted that Stefanik -- who was previously the chair of the House Republican Conference -- "gave up her leadership position" after Trump nominated her, and that she will return to the House "as a rank-and-file member.
46% : " READ MORE: (Opinion) 'No adult supervision': Concern escalates as Trump appears increasingly out of touch "They could've fessed up about the Signal goof or shown some accountability but instead they're pulling nominees because they know they're losing ground with the electorate," Bloomberg opinion columnist Conor Sen skeeted (the accepted term for Bluesky posts).
46% : " READ MORE: (Opinion) 'No adult supervision': Concern escalates as Trump appears increasingly out of touch "They could've fessed up about the Signal goof or shown some accountability but instead they're pulling nominees because they know they're losing ground with the electorate," Bloomberg opinion columnist Conor Sen skeeted (the accepted term for Bluesky posts).
36% : READ MORE: 'Political protection racket': Bondi blasted for shrugging off security breach investigation "With a very tight Majority, I don't want to take a chance on anyone else running for Elise's seat," Trump wrote.
33% : " Many political observers speculated that Trump was far more afraid than he was letting on about next week's special elections for vacant House seats in the Sunshine State.
33% : " Many political observers speculated that Trump was far more afraid than he was letting on about next week's special elections for vacant House seats in the Sunshine State.
30% : " "With a very tight Majority, I don't want to take a chance on anyone else running for Elise's seat," Trump wrote.
29% : " READ MORE: 'Tide's turning' for Dems in Florida as special election reveals 'buyer's remorse' among Trump voters Trump wrote on his Truth Social account that his primary motivation for pulling Stefanik's nomination was his concern over risking the slim Republican majority in the House of Representatives.
27% : Matt Rice, who is the Washington correspondent for the New York Sun, tweeted that Trump was saying "out loud" that he was concerned Democrats could flip Stefanik's reliably Republican district.
27% : Matt Rice, who is the Washington correspondent for the New York Sun, tweeted that Trump was saying "out loud" that he was concerned Democrats could flip Stefanik's reliably Republican district.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.