Raw Story'Fringy': Ex-prosecutor skeptical of Trump team's 'extreme' long-term plan
- Bias Rating
4% Center
- Reliability
80% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-1% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
28% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
60% : Well, the theory is, well, then maybe what Donald Trump or any two-term president can do is run as vice president with, let's say, J.D. Vance at the top of the ticket.59% : Donald Trump becomes president.
38% : " ALSO READ: 'Caesar figure': MAGA die-hards pushing 3rd Trump term met with CPAC silence The idea is that Trump wouldn't have been "elected" as president, but would take over after the election of Vance.
34% : Over the weekend, he trotted out the line again, promising he's "not joking." Speaking to CNN about it on Monday, legal analyst Elie Honig pointed to specific words in the Constitution and what Trump has said.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
