Daily Caller News Foundation Article Rating'Garland Didn't Care And Was All On Board': Gregg Jarrett Calls Out Jack Smith's Violations In Handling Trump Case
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
95% ReliableExcellent
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-64% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
4% Positive
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
36% : "This was a correct ruling by Judge Cannon who dismissed the case against Trump months ago because Jack Smith was unlawfully appointed as special counsel.29% : U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon temporarily halted the Justice Department's release of a report by Smith concerning investigations related to Trump.
28% : "He was trying to unduly influence the election against Trump.
14% : "It's totally unfair to Donald Trump to release it, a one-sided report filled with unproven accusations that only has, as you point out, one objective: to sully the incoming president.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.