
House GOP trying to use election security to mask voter suppression
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
10% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
40% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-8% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
53% : Under the SAVE Act, all Americans registering to vote or updating their registration (after moving, getting married or changing their name) would be required to present proof of citizenship in person.42% : Every American who believes in the right to vote -- even those who believe in the need for greater election security -- must admit that the SAVE Act goes too far.
39% : While new documents might eventually be obtained, under the SAVE Act, Americans who are already enduring the hardship of being forcibly displaced by a natural disaster would be unable to register to vote or update their previous voter registration to provide their new address until such a time that they received a new passport or birth certificate -- a process that can take months or even years.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.