How Can Liberals Strike a Pose as the Guardians of Democracy?
- Bias Rating
76% Very Conservative
- Reliability
30% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
96% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-61% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
21% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
40% : They don't have the mental capacity to consider the possibility that it's not undemocratic for Trump and conservatives to propose that in a second Trump term, it would be desirable to have executive-branch appointees who are more loyal to the elected president than unelected liberal media agitators; that it would be nice to have employees who don't immediately leak damaging things to Trump-hating media outlets to undercut every policy initiative and every pro-Trump political appointee.38% : They pretend that throwing a former president off a primary ballot isn't doing someone a favor -- and by the usual rebound, the beneficiary will be Trump.
38% : How can liberals strike a pose as the staunch guardians of democracy as they strike people from the ballot? An Associated Press report displayed intellectual incoherence in noting the liberal group "Free Speech for People" filed a lawsuit in Oregon "seeking to bounce Trump from the ballot there."
36% : Their pull quote underlined the sentiment: "A state's court saw that concluding whether Trump engaged in an insurrection can't be left to voters.
33% : Liberal journalists who burst with pride over how they keep democracy from dying in darkness have been warning that a second term for Trump would mean the end of democracy.
26% : Now, the liberals are explicitly advocating that there are no voting rights to pick Trump.
23% : They warn Trump will use his Justice Department to indict his enemies.
6% : Without Donald Trump being convicted (or even accused) of insurrection for the Jan. 6 riot on Capitol Hill, four Democrat-appointed judges decided Trump is an insurrectionist who must be removed from the Republican primary ballot.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.