Sports Illustrated Article RatingIf Falcons QB Kirk Cousins Wants to Avoid Penix Repeat, Browns Aren't His Best Bet
- Bias Rating
4% Center
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
4% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
5% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : " The Browns may not select a quarterback at No. 2 overall -- Carter is the perceived favorite -- but they're heavily expected to exit the first two days of the draft with a young passer.48% : " Stefanski spoke highly about non-quarterback candidates for the Browns at No. 2 overall, including Penn State outside linebacker Abdul Carter and Colorado receiver/cornerback Travis Hunter, who Stefanski described as special and unique.
44% : It also worked out Ward, though Browns general manager Andrew Berry said Monday that Cleveland is "unlikely" to trade up to No. 1 overall -- where it likely needs to be to draft Ward.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
