Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started
Benzinga Article Rating

Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. Investors: Please contact the Portnoy Law Firm to recover your losses. April 14, 2025 Deadline to file Lead Plaintiff Motion - Intellia Therapeutics (NASDAQ:NTLA)

Apr 11, 2025 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    -8% Center

  • Reliability

    50% ReliableAverage

  • Policy Leaning

    -8% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    N/A

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

17% Positive

  •   Liberal
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

54% : The Intellia class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) defendants created the false impression that they possessed reliable information pertaining to the viability of NTLA-3001's development and eventual marketing, if approved; (ii) Intellia's optimistic reports of timelines, including dosing and future studies of the drug, fell short of reality; the NTLA program was not viable or sustainable for Intellia because viral-based editing programs remained expensive and inefficient in comparison to then-existing non-viral delivery methods; (iii) Intellia was not equipped to timely dose patients with NTLA-3001, maintain the drug's research and development, or even to maintain its full staff in light of the existing scientific landscape surrounding viral-based editing drugs; and (iv) even if NTLA-3001 proved successful, the use of viral-based editing drugs is costly, inefficient, and poor mitigators of adverse effects in patients.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link