RedStateIrony Alert: Hakeem Jeffries Furious Over Greg Abbott 'Slow Walking' an Election -- Guess Who Did It First?
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
65% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
24% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-48% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-21% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : Just to recap, when Trump announced his intention to make Elise Stefanik his U.N. ambassador back in November, Democrats, led by New York Governor Kathy Hochul, began to devise a way for Hochul to delay a special election as long as possible in order to keep the Republican's House majority as narrow as possible.44% : Aligning with Trump, even if it benefits the American people, is a fate worse than death for a Democrat.
29% : If you said the concerted effort of the Democrat Party to delay the presumed special election to replace Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), who was expected to resign in order to become President Trump's ambassador to the United Nations, you'd be correct.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
