Financial Times Article RatingIt's time for Europe's magical thinking on defence to end
- Bias Rating
12% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
25% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
18% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
21% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
8% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
59% : If his administration really wants Europe to secure itself, it should get behind EU efforts to stimulate European defence production.57% : If European leaders fixate on appeasing Trump, they will win a pyrrhic victory.
56% : In return, Trump should agree to stay within Nato to enable a responsible security transition over the next decade.
32% : Trump reflects this problem, but he didn't cause it.
12% : When Trump contemplates not defending a Nato ally under attack, his scepticism better indicates how Americans will act in a crisis than President Joe Biden's talk of a "sacred obligation".
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.