The Daily Signal Article Rating

Jimmy Carter's Legacy on Election Integrity That Would Prompt Democrats to Label Him Jim Crow 2.0 Today

  • Bias Rating

    60% Medium Conservative

  • Reliability

    55% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    12% Somewhat Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -42% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-4% Negative

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

61% : "Many of the non-controversial suggestions supported by the former Democratic president in 2005 would be fiercely opposed and outright smeared by his own party years later.
58% : One could certainly be that as president, Carter didn't champion election integrity laws-but reforms such as voter ID are nevertheless a lasting part of his legacy.
57% : These included restrictions on ballot harvesting and extending voter ID to mail-in voting.
47% : "Democrats such as former Georgia lawmaker Stacey Abrams, then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and Biden who had become president, called the laws "Jim Crow 2.0."
46% : The report called for adopting national voter ID, clearing the names of dead people from voter registration lists, restricting ballot harvesting, and for allowing election observers at polling sites.
39% : The report continued: "The electoral system cannot inspire public confidence if no safeguards exist to deter or detect fraud or to confirm the identity of voters.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link