Jordan, Comer, & Grassley Need To Be Investigated

Feb 21, 2024 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    -62% Medium Liberal

  • Reliability

    35% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    10% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    -23% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

12% Positive

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

48% : Former State Assistant Attorney General Tristan Snell, who won New York's $25 million case against Trump, the largest ever at the time, said Tuesday night that House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, House Oversight Committee Chairman Jim Comer, and U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, "were either duped by Smirnov and the Kremlin -- or they were in on it."Alexander Smirnov, Politico reported Tuesday evening, is the "former FBI informant charged with making up a multimillion-dollar bribery scheme involving President Joe Biden, his son Hunter and a Ukrainian energy company."
33% : The former New York State prosecutor who led the successful investigation and prosecution of Donald Trump's "Trump University" is calling on the U.S. Dept. of Justice to act "immediately" to investigate communications from top congressional Republicans in light of Tuesday night's bombshell revelation that the FBI's former informant may have fed the Bureau false Kremlin-concocted propaganda attacking President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link