WAOW Article Rating

Judge Crawford & Schimel debate for Wisconsin Supreme Court seat

Mar 13, 2025 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    -6% Center

  • Reliability

    50% ReliableAverage

  • Policy Leaning

    -6% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    N/A

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

41% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

55% : " "The challenge that I raised back in the 2011-2012 period, I was focused on a particular provision that it challenged, my understanding of the new case that is moving through the courts is that it's involving a different provision," Crawford said.
51% : " Both judges also addressed their stance on Act 10, illustrating their viewpoints regarding the collective bargaining rights act.
46% : Crawford was part of a group of attorneys who tried to overturn Act 10 in 2011.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link