Letters: Tribune Editorial Board and Paul Vallas ignore Chicagoans' needs
- Bias Rating
54% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
50% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
34% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-30% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-8% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
65% : No one is addressing all together the Chicago Police Department's shorthandedness, the large-scale absence of 311 and traffic enforcement, the plight of the public schools, and the broken condition of streets and sidewalks.55% : The public may be left with the perception that public employees will earn Social Security on top of pensions for the same work.
54% : Regarding the editorial "How property tax increases became a new third rail in US politics" (Jan. 6) and Paul Vallas' op-ed "Council can address the financial crisis to come if it begins now" (Jan. 3): The Tribune Editorial Board joins failed mayoral candidate Vallas in railing against taxes and imagining major city budgeting with absolutely no attention to the needs of Chicagoans and the broken physical state of the city.
54% : For example, if someone worked in a corporate job for 20 years and then became a public school teacher, they would now be able to collect the full amount of what they earned paying into Social Security for 20 years, which would be completely separate from whatever they earn toward a public pension.
39% : Actually, the bill rectifies the unfair practice of cutting Social Security for the private sector work these employees have done.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.