Mike Johnson tells DOGE co-heads he is 'clearing the decks' with spending bill - Washington Examiner

  • Bias Rating

    -10% Center

  • Reliability

    35% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    8% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    -49% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

2% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

65% : We gotta get this done because here's the key: by doing this, we are clearing the decks, and we are setting up for Trump to come in roaring back with the America First agenda.
48% : Johnson detailed a text conversation he had with billionaires Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, the two co-heads of the Department of Government Efficiency, which he discussed after being asked about Musk's assessment of his spending bill and how it "should not pass."
23% : On X, Ramaswamy assessed how the bill is full of "excessive spending" along with "pork barrel politics" and argued that Congress needs to vote no on it if it wants to take DOGE's mission of government efficiency seriously.CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINERSen. Rand Paul (R-KY) also criticized Johnson and his bill, arguing the latter showcases how "he is a weak, weak man."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link