
Mike Johnson's big beautiful win
- Bias Rating
-2% Center
- Reliability
30% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
15% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
83% : "Trump has been an incredible ally in this whole process.73% : Trump wants one "big beautiful bill," and Senate Republicans should work with their House colleagues to make it happen.
67% : But Trump also has tremendous political power he can wield within the party, and Johnson was wise to tap that power when needed.
66% : "Trump helped us with a number of members," House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) added.
56% : Johnson knows what is needed to secure his conference, and tax legislation is not going to get the job done.
50% : The possibility for real conservative progress to be made on a number of matters, including cutting government spending, is now very real.
48% : These are spread among a number of committees, including the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has been charged with finding $880 million in cuts that are expected to come largely from Medicaid.
45% : Instead, he called in help from Trump, who secured the final three votes to get the resolution to the 217 votes needed to advance.
45% : But Trump is in the White House now.
43% : Johnson finally settled on not using the word "Medicaid" in the final resolution while still assigning the size of the cuts expected from Medicaid to the proper committee.
39% : But passing them by themselves would reduce the leverage Johnson and Trump need to secure passage in the House.
34% : Trump does not have the time or aptitude, and his talents would be wasted overseeing the day-to-day legislative process in the House.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.