MILLOY: SCOTUS Has Crippled Biden's EPA, But There's Only One Way To Stop Them For Good

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

50% :SCOTUS has now reined in EPA a bit.
49% : It's a decision that could be every bit as momentous as West Virginia v. EPA.
48% : The case of Young v. EPA, which is pending decision in the U.S. District Court for Washington, D.C., could slow the agency's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions through the back door of ozone and particulate matter.
46% : Today's decision in West Virginia v. EPA puts an end to the agency's scheming over the past 24 years to invent its own authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.
45% : Although EPA does have clear authority to regulate those emissions, EPA has twisted the related science to the point where it claims that no emissions from coal plants are safe for human health.
44% : "Congress did not grant EPA ... the authority to devise emissions caps based on the generation shifting approach the Agency took in the Clean Power Plan," a 6-3 majority wrote.
43% : Expanding on this point, the majority wrote, "We cannot ignore that the regulatory writ EPA newly uncovered conveniently enabled it to enact a program that, long after the dangers posed by greenhouse gas emissions had become well known, Congress considered and rejected multiple times."
40% : In combination with other Obama EPA activities that comprised its infamous "war on coal," the Clean Power Plan helped send virtually the entire U.S. coal industry into bankruptcy, killed 50,000 high paying coal jobs and devastated coal industry dependent communities.
31% : The plaintiffs in Young v. EPA have alleged that EPA illegally stacked its science review boards with agency cronies so as to rig the science related to ozone and particulate emissions.
29% : As the Obama EPA reasoned and implemented in its war-on-coal regulations, greenhouse gas emissions from coal plants can be reduced as a collateral effect if limits are placed on the amounts of ozone-forming and particulate emissions that are allowed to be emitted from coal plants.
28% : As someone who worked in the coal industry during the Obama years and witnessed first-hand the hardships caused by the rogue Obama EPA, my first reaction is:"Where do coal industry investors, employees and communities go to recoup their losses caused by illegal government activity?"

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.