
Obamacare mandates at stake in Supreme Court arguments - Washington Examiner
- Bias Rating
42% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
80% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
56% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
12% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
31% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : Trump signaled last week that lowering the cost of healthcare, particularly prescription drugs, is a priority for the administration.48% : Since the initial passage of Obamacare, the USPSTF has implemented 10 different preventive service mandates for a variety of health conditions, according to the left-leaning healthcare think tank KFF.
45% : " If the court rules that the USPSTF's structure violates the Constitution's Appointments Clause, its ability to make binding coverage mandates under the Affordable Care Act could be struck down.
45% : That case law will likely affect Kennedy v. Braidwood, but Hughes says it's impossible to discern exactly how. SUPREME COURT CASE OFFERS TRUMP PATH TO DISMANTLE OBAMACARE MANDATES "The Supreme Court is not predictable, and the trend toward curtailing the role of experts and the administrative state could win the day," Hughes said.
42% : The initial complaint from Braidwood Management in this case argued that coverage of PrEP medications violated the deeply held beliefs of the owner, Steven Hotze, who contended that PrEP is associated with same-sex and extramarital sexual activity, contradicting his Christian convictions and therefore violating the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
30% : Although repealing and replacing Obamacare was a platform plank in President Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and an unrealized agenda item in his first term, this case does not threaten broad portions of the ACA, as past cases did.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.