Only these people will be able to stop Trump from two years of chaos and harm
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
60% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-17% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-15% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
62% : Oz is Trump's pick to head up federal health insurance programs Medicare and Medicaid, but is known for his promotion of supplements and herbs for which there's little or no scientific evidence.61% : Michelson says Trump understands the importance of having his people in place and he knows how to work the system.
49% : "Melissa Michelson, a political scientist at Menlo College in California, thinks Trump will be much more successful this time around at making the changes he wants to implement.
48% : "America always wants change, and so Trump is likely to just have two years in the same way that Biden really only had two years.
46% : Project 2025, which Trump distanced himself from on the campaign trail, is a far-right plan that proposes a radical overhaul of the federal government, abolishing several departments, stifling dissenting voices, and implementing policies targeting immigrants, reproductive healthcare, and certain civil rights protections.
45% : Then there's former Representative Tulsi Gabbard, who Trump wants as his director of national intelligence, but who faces scrutiny for a "fact-finding" visit she paid to Syria in 2017 to meet since-ousted dictator Bashar al-Assad.
44% : "Farnsworth says that in reality, Trump probably has two years to implement his agenda.
43% : "Farnsworth adds that from the point of view of a functioning democracy, it's important to note that when Trump suggested that the Senate just adjourn and let him appoint everybody without hearings and background checks, the Republicans in the Senate declined.
40% : "Think about the number of chiefs of staff, defense secretaries, secretaries of state, attorneys general and others that Trump went through -- in part because they told him he couldn't do something and he chafed at that.
30% : "And so," he says, "Trump, in some ways, is setting himself up for a kind of a risky environment.
30% : In the last week, the Maga movement became embroiled in a very public spat after Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, who Trump has selected to lead a new Department of Government Efficiency, waded into a debate about H-1B visas, which allow US employers to temporarily recruit skilled foreign workers.
27% : And then there are people like Mitch McConnell who care a great deal about the authority of the Senate and who are not, in all likelihood, going to be facing voters again period, so he'll likely not care that much about what Trump wants and take the longer view about the Senate's role in the political system over time.
25% : And to those who say, 'well, he can't do that because that's against the law,' I'd say: have you not just watched Trump run roughshod over the rule of law and get away with it?
18% : "If Trump wants to go too far down the road of tariffs, which could lead to a recession, there's likely to be some pushback.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.