
Pete Hegseth embroiled in ANOTHER astonishing war plan group chat leak
- Bias Rating
4% Center
- Reliability
30% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
26% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-22% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-11% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
64% : The story came out following a week after three top staffers under Hegseth at the Pentagon were forced to resign amid a probe into leaks at the Department of Defense.56% : 'We are incredibly disappointed by the manner in which our service at the Department of Defense ended,' Caldwell posted on X. 'Unnamed Pentagon officials have slandered our character with baseless attacks on our way out the door.' Caldwell and the others added: 'We still have not been told what exactly we were investigated for, if there is still an active investigation, or if there was even a real investigation of 'leaks' to begin with.'
51% : Revelations of another use of Signal for classified information come as one of Hegseth's leading advisers, Dan Caldwell, was escorted from the Pentagon last week after being identified during an investigation into leaks at the Department of Defense.
50% : 'There is a clear public interest in disclosing the sort of information that Trump advisers included in non-secure communications channels, especially because senior administration figures are attempting to downplay the significance of the messages that were shared,' the journalists added.
47% : 'This investigation will commence immediately and culminate in a report to the Secretary of Defense.'
46% : Selnick also performed the duties of the under secretary of Defense for personnel and readiness.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.