
SAVE ACT requiring proof of citizenship to vote passes House
- Bias Rating
-4% Center
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-6% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-37% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
31% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
59% : The House's passage of the SAVE Act comes after a Gallup Poll released last year found that 83% of citizens support requiring proof of citizenship when registering to vote for the first time.58% : I am grateful that my colleagues answered the call and passed the SAVE Act, as this serves as a critical first step to ensure that we maintain election integrity throughout our country.
51% : "Despite the ridiculous attacks and purposeful misinformation spread about the bill, I am pleased to see that the House of Representatives once again passed the SAVE Act on a bipartisan basis to ensure only U.S. citizens vote in federal elections," Roy said in a statement.
42% : " Trump added that "votes be cast and received by the election date established in law" and that late counted votes are akin to "allowing persons who arrive three days after Election Day, perhaps after a winner has been declared, to vote in person at a former voting precinct, which would be absurd.
42% : States and Congress do," one legal complaint from the League of United Latin American Citizens, the Secure Families Initiative, and the Arizona Students' Association read.
37% : Democrats such as Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR) have pointed to election laws already in place and data that show non-citizen voting in elections is rare to argue that the SAVE Act is unnecessary and redundant.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.