Check out this free eBook to learn more about detecting misinformation in the news.

'Significant repercussions': Supreme Court limits government power to curb water pollution
- Bias Rating
-2% Center
- Reliability
95% ReliableExcellent
- Policy Leaning
-4% Center
- Politician Portrayal
20% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Center
-2%
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
52% : In a decision long awaited by Iowa farmers, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday sided with a couple who have been battling the Environmental Protection Agency for more than a decade over water quality regulations affecting their plan to develop a property in the Idaho panhandle.*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.


Check out this free eBook to learn more about detecting misinformation in the news.