Social Security expansion passes Senate, heads to Biden's desk - Washington Examiner
- Bias Rating
20% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
80% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
44% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
15% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
41% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
68% : Millions of Social Security recipients will soon see an expansion of their benefits after the Senate on Saturday passed the bipartisan Social Security Fairness Act.59% : "Social Security is the foundation of retirement income for most Americans," said Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), a co-author of the bill.
55% : It's unclear how quickly the Social Security Administration will be able to update future benefits and make retroactive payments.
48% : "Non-covered earnings" most often apply to jobs with federal, state, or local governments, non-profit groups, and employers based in other countries.
47% : The WEP applies to those who have a pension from jobs not subject to Social Security payroll tax, while the GPO reduces benefits of spouses and widows or widowers with a government-based pension from jobs also not covered by Social Security.
44% : Critics made a twofold case against it: Social Security will run out of money sooner, and expanding benefits to those with jobs that weren't covered by Social Security taxes is unfair to taxpayers.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.