Special Counsel Jack Smith's Report Reveals He Was Supremely Confident About One Thing

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

64% : Trump still won.
41% : The lengthy document was released after a week-long legal battle, as Trump attempted to prevent the material from reaching the public before he is sworn in for a second term as president next week.
39% : The release of the second report remains in legal limbo (via WaPo): If Donald Trump didn't win the presidential election in November, the Justice Department had ample evidence to convict him at trial of trying to obstruct the 2020 election results, special counsel Jack Smith said in a report released early Tuesday morning.
37% : Trump winning the 2024 election was the final nail in the coffin (via Fox News): Attorney General Merrick Garland released the first volume, which focuses on the election case against Trump, of Smith's report on Tuesday at midnight after back-and-forth in the federal court system.
32% : In the lengthy report, Smith said his office fully stands behind the decision to bring criminal charges against Trump because he "resorted to a series of criminal efforts to retain power" after he lost the 2020 election. Smith said in his conclusion that the parties were determining whether any material in the "superseding indictment was subject to presidential immunity" when it became clear that Trump had won the 2024 election.
31% : Smith was also confident that he could've convicted Trump.
20% : This report centered on the election interference shenanigans, which indirectly vindicated Trump for not being responsible for the January 6 riot.
14% : Trump is president, and Kamala is not.
12% : In an early Tuesday morning post on Truth Social, Trump called Smith "desperate" and "deranged" for releasing his "fake findings" in the middle of the night.
11% : Please, do scream 'Trump is a convicted felon' or this, that, and the other relating to this report -- but we won, and Kamala Harris still lost.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.