Financial Times Article RatingSteel, energy, sports cars: How China poured more than $100bn into Britain
- Bias Rating
-36% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
50% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-36% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
18% Positive
- Liberal
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
64% : While state-owned enterprises have concentrated investment in energy and infrastructure, private investors have focused on real estate and strategic manufacturing sectors such as semiconductors, steel and transport.57% : But he added that the UK had been one of the top destinations for Chinese funding over the past two decades, with state-owned companies accounting for a "notably high share" of funding.
55% : Derek Scissors, senior fellow at AEI, said the "size and expertise" of state-owned enterprises made them attractive partners for large energy and transport projects, such as nuclear power plants.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
