Supreme Court to hear case over Planned Parenthood Medicaid funding - Roll Call
- Bias Rating
24% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
35% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
24% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
1% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services put combined federal and state Medicaid spending at $805.7 billion in calendar year 2022.53% : "Congress enacted this provision to ensure that Medicaid recipients, like other individuals, could make deeply personal choices about where to obtain medical care without states 'restricting beneficiaries to certain providers,'" Planned Parenthood argued.
52% : In its brief opposing the return of the case to the Supreme Court, Planned Parenthood argued that the Medicaid law was meant to provide an individual right to their choice of provider from anyone that meets the legal requirements.
51% : The justices only agreed to hear one portion of the case, as requested by Planned Parenthood, and did not agree to hear whether there is a federal right to obtain care from a provider a state has determined is unqualified.
50% : The 4th Circuit eventually ruled again, affirming its original decision that Planned Parenthood had a right under federal law to sue for Medicaid funding.
49% : South Carolina argued that Congress never meant to create an individual federal right to a choice of a Medicaid provider and urged the justices to overturn a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit keeping Planned Parenthood in the program.
49% : Planned Parenthood sued, arguing that the federal program includes language that "any qualified provider" is eligible to provide services and receive Medicaid funding, regardless of a state determination about the program.
49% : In 2023, the Supreme Court vacated a 4th Circuit ruling that kept the state locked into a funding agreement with Planned Parenthood as a result of an unrelated case about a similar right in mental health care.
45% : States such as Arkansas, Missouri, Mississippi and Texas have laws restricting funding for Medicaid services, according to court papers.
44% : The fight dates back to 2018, when the state's governor sought to exclude abortion providers from receiving Medicaid family planning funding as part of Medicaid's federal-state shared structure, saying that any funds to Planned Parenthood and other clinics helped subsidize abortion care.
42% : States have sought to strip funding from Planned Parenthood and other providers for "unwarranted and politically motivated" reasons -- rather than the providers' ability to provide qualified care, the organization argued.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.