Supreme Court opens door to overturning rights to contraceptives, same-sex relationships and marriage

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

51% : She continued, "These are our most basic liberties -- to live a life of dignity, private from government interference.
47% : Thomas called for the reconsideration of Griswold v. Connecticut, which established the right of married couples to use contraception; Lawrence v. Texas, which protects the right to same-sex romantic relationships; and Obergefell v. Hodges, which establishes the right to same-sex marriage.
39% : Still, Justice Samuel Alito stated in the opinion that other unenumerated rights that aren't explicitly mentioned in the Constitution are not immediately in doubt."To ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right," the document states.
38% : "Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion."
37% :Thomas' note to "correct the error" established in other precedents, however, has put LGBTQ groups like GLAAD, the National LGBTQ Task Force and reproductive rights organizations like Planned Parenthood, on edge.
36% : When activists learned the Supreme Court was considering overturning abortion rights, they feared other rights, such as same-sex marriage, same-sex relationships and contraceptives, might be next.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.