Thank you for following The Conversation. You will receive email notifications for this source. To make changes to this, please visit your account.
You need to upgrade in order to follow more news source and receive email notifications about new articles and ratings, as your subscription allows only source. To change which news sources you follow, please visit your account.
Supreme Court says state lawmakers can't just ignore state law when drawing voting districts or choosing presidential electors
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
48% : Racial gerrymandering is still subject to regulation by the U.S. Constitution, federal law, such as the Voting Rights Act, and state law. 43% : In the 2019 ruling, Rucho v. Common Cause, the Supreme Court deemed partisan gerrymandering a political question, not subject to regulation by the federal Constitution.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
The Conversation
