New York Post Article RatingThank Hugh Hefner's funding for today's warped sex education lessons
- Bias Rating
-4% Center
- Reliability
20% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
-4% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
34% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : Hefner also donated to Planned Parenthood, the Kinsey Institute itself, and the sex researchers Masters and Johnson.50% : And SIECUS has, since Hefner's grant in the 1960s, become a power player in shaping what American kids learn about sex in public schools.
50% : Under its guidance, lessons that once focused narrowly on the mechanics of reproduction have taken on an activist streak: "Comprehensive sex education" covers gender identity, STIs, pornography, masturbation, plus a whole bunch of acts that have nothing to do with making babies.
48% : No shock then to find Planned Parenthood (another beneficiary of Big Porn) blurring the boundary between childhood innocence and sexual experience.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
