
The Democrats' Lost Millions
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
80% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-18% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
5% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
59% : " This kind of perennial presence in communities goes beyond elections, intertwining political influence with everyday life.55% : " Rocha was a senior adviser to Ruben Gallego, who won a Senate seat in Arizona, a state that Trump won handily.
50% : Even a single in-person conversation with potential voters can increase turnout by up to nine points, according to political scientists Alan Gerber and Donald Green.
50% : "And we will -- Donald Trump's going to tank the stock market.
49% : While Trump certainly made inroads with Asian and Latino voters, especially Latino men, Harris still won the majority of both, 55 and 51 percent respectively.
46% : For plenty of marginalized groups, the way institutions and systems respond to their identities is a very real issue; their existence is itself politicized, and thus deserves political attention.
46% : Instead of selectively investing in Black and other non-white communities during election seasons, they would need sustained, year-round engagement.
45% : A 2017 study from political scientists David Broockman and Joshua Kalla estimated that campaign ads had -- wait for it -- zero effect on voting decisions.
37% : That's roughly 36 percent of eligible voters -- more people than voted for either Harris or Trump, and in line with rates of nonparticipation going back nearly a century.
36% : "The way we heard white nationalist rhetoric from Trump and MAGA?
36% : (There is a reason political scientists refer to independents as "closeted partisans.")
32% : Citing her 2018 campaign for governor -- which, though unsuccessful and marred by allegations of GOP chicanery, gave Georgia Democrats their highest vote share in 20 years in a statewide race and presaged Biden's win -- Abrams wrote that she "championed reforms to eliminate police shootings of African Americans, protect the LGBTQ community against ersatz religious freedom legislation, expand Medicaid to save rural hospitals, and reaffirm that undocumented immigrants deserve legal protections.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.