The Guardian view on capital punishment: an upsurge in executions should concern us all | Editorial
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
45% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-34% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-34% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
66% : While the blood-hungry may seem to be in the ascendant, there is more reason than ever to push for an end to state-mandated murder.53% : Joe Biden's decision to commute the sentences of 37 men under federal death sentences in December was welcome.
37% : And state death sentences are vastly more common than federal: the Death Penalty Information Center says that about 2,250 prisoners are on death row.
27% : States are not only more aggressive in seeking and implementing death sentences, but are turning to crueller methods including nitrogen gas - banned by veterinarians for use on most mammals across Europe and the US.
22% : Thirteen federal prisoners were executed in the first term of Donald Trump, a death penalty zealot - more than under the previous 10 presidents combined.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.