The Supreme Court's EPA Ruling Is Going to Be Very, Very Expensive

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

61% : Michael Wara: It doesn't limit EPA from regulating greenhouse-gas emissions in general, which was a possibility in this case.
54% : One tell there is what the coal-mining industry is doing.
45% : Today's major environmental ruling from the Supreme Court, West Virginia v. EPA, is probably most notable for what it did not do.
45% : The major-questions doctrine could theoretically prevent the Biden administration from issuing new rules on other major topics, such as student loans or immigration.
43% : It doesn't say that EPA can't regulate greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plants.
41% : It did not say that the Environmental Protection Agency is prohibited from regulating heat-trapping carbon pollution from America's existing power plants.
40% : Coal prices are up; coal mining, not up.
37% : So I think it's possible that we could see the EPA require carbon capture and storage, and that would be the death of coal.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.